Redirects and SEO

Community Forums Forums General Discussion Redirects and SEO

This topic is: not resolved

Tagged: ,

This topic contains 18 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  Summer 5 months, 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #88331

    matts
    Member
    Post count: 28

    Just so I understand the htaccess redirect a little more, it will replace the primary url of every incoming link from oldsite.com/whatever to newsite.com/whatever? It’s not going to just redirect all incoming links to just the home page?

    So I am thinking to be safe, I should just do individual redirects on everything? Sounds like weeks of work.

    #88345

    Summer
    Participant
    Post count: 954

    That’s the way that .htaccess snippet should work, yes.

    And if you want to maintain the Google love you already enjoy with your current site, individually redirecting your old links to your new ones is the only way to do that… a mass redirect of everything just to the new home page will not preserve that status.

    And take it from someone who’s still working through fixing thousands of 404s, it will take you a while.


    #88346

    Lorraine
    Participant
    Post count: 28

    That is where getting someone who is good with regular expression might work.

    #88354

    Summer
    Participant
    Post count: 954

    Alas, the regex method can’t work for me. I have literally thousands of old Movable Type formatted permalinks, and there is no way to create a single pattern that will handle translating them from the old link name to the new one… the old links used underscores as spaces between words, the new ones use hyphens, the old links didn’t have yr/mo/dt or yr/mo and the new ones do… it’s heinous, and with the other sites I work on for myself and for clients, I’ll be at this for another 6 months at least, with just the two biggest sites.

    The archives are the worst… I have to actually go digging through web.archive.org for snapshots of my site they took between 2002-2006, just to figure out what month/year /archives/000045.html is supposed to be, or somesuch.


Viewing 4 posts - 16 through 19 (of 19 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.